Put your Obama conspiracy comments that don’t relate to the current articles here. This thread will close in two weeks.
Welcome
Obama Conspiracy Theories since 2008 has been your destination for conspiracy theories and fringe views about Barack Obama. Having an argument with your buddies at the office? You're in the right place. Use the Search box below or check out our featured articles. If you don't agree with what you see, feel free to add your thoughts to the over 250,000 comments others have left. To leave a comment visit the Open Thread.
Also check out The debunker's guide to Obama conspiracy theoriesConspiracies
Recent Comments
View the site's Comment feed.Donate
Recommended books
- 935 Lies: The Future of Truth and the Decline of America's Moral Integrity
- A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America
- Arpaio De Facto Lawman
- Barack Obama: The Story
- Beyond Fear: Thinking Sensibly About Security in an Uncertain World
- Bullspotting: Finding Facts in the Age of Misinformation
- Chasing Phantoms: Reality, Imagination, and Homeland Security Since 9/11
- Conspiracy Nation: The Politics of Paranoia in Postwar America
- Conspiracy Theories: Secrecy and Power in American Culture
- Cults, Conspiracies, and Secret Societies: The Straight Scoop on Freemasons, The Illuminati, Skull and Bones, Black Helicopters, The New World Order, and many, many more
- Idiot America: How Stupidity Became a Virtue in the Land of the Free
- Is Barack Obama's Birth Certificate a Fraud?
- One Electorate Under God?: A Dialogue on Religion and American Politics (Pew Forum Dialogues on Religion & Public Life)
- Our Friend Barry: Classmates' Recollections of Barack Obama and Punahou School
- Religion and the Racist Right: The Origins of the Christian Identity Movement
- The Authoritarians
- The Believing Brain: From Ghosts and Gods to Politics and Conspiracies—How We Construct Beliefs and Reinforce Them as Truths
- The Citizenship Debates: A Reader
- The Development of American Citizenship, 1608-1870
- The New Hate: A History of Fear and Loathing on the Populist Right
- The Paranoid Style in American Politics
- The Scapegoat
- The United States of Paranoia: A Conspiracy Theory
- Them: Adventures with Extremists
Quick Reference
- Birther aggregator
- Congressional Research Service report on presidential eligibility
- Donald, You're FIred! – FactCheck.org
- Hawaii Department of Health Obama FAQ
- Hawaii verification of birth certificate
- Jack Ryan document collection on Scribd
- Made in the U.S.A. – FactCheck.org
- Nordyke twins birth certificate
- Obama Certificate of Live Birth – Gurhrie Photo
- Obama Certificate of Live Birth – Press
- Obama Certificate of Live Birth – White House
- Obama Certification of Live Birth
- Obama presidential library
- Obama White House archive site
- Politifact Birth Certificate articles
- Recent court rulings on presidential eligibility
- The debunker's guide to Obama conspiracy theories
- The Great Mother of all Natural Born Citizenship Quotation Pages
Archives
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- Mastodon
My Other Blogs
The open thread, she is closed.
This is fixed in Windows Insider Build 10617.
Shocking, surprising, dare I even say yuge, statistic mentioned in http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2015/09/donald_trump_doesn_t_correct_birthers_but_how_is_that_any_worse_than_the.html :
…annnd I just noticed that you’ve got a link to the quoted poll at the bottom of a recent article.
Many people in the #birther Twitter feed insist that Clinton campaign promoted birtherism. Quite annoying to see such misinformation.
In a shocking new development, David Farrar doesn’t know what “subject matter jurisdiction” means, but refers to it anyway:
“The offspring born here of illegal aliens cannot be subject to US jurisdiction when another foreign sovereignty already has subject matter jurisdiction, which the US is by treaty and international law required to recognize, as they are required to recognize our own citizenship law.”
https://disqus.com/home/discussion/thehill-v4/trump_dodges_birther_questions/#comment-2263929249
I wouldn’t be surprised if he doesn’t know what “wearing pants” means.
and another GOP hopeful decides to piss on the constitution and commit political suicide…..
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-34308716
wow….just wow!
oh the irony! – bob gets upset because his comments were not used….
http://www.birtherreport.com/2015/09/shot-down-dc-reporter-skirts-facts.html
LOL!
On a side note, I’ve been having a little dialogue with David Farrar’s twin brother, who is positively a delight in comparison:
https://disqus.com/home/discussion/thehill-v4/trump_dodges_birther_questions/#comment-2265866016
I may have to consider mollifying the hard line on David a little bit as a courtesy to his twin.
That’s great news! Being a German, I now know next time I come over to the US, I can commit crimes (including murder) with impunity as it’s gonna be up to my government whether they will punish me or not. 🙂
I was left wondering, what reporter would even ask this fringe nutjob for his opinions? And now I know — it’s another case of a news house pathetically reacting to false charges of liberal bias by hiring a wingnut.
RIP Jack Larson -cub reporter.
The RWNJ are now posting that the birther questions started with Hillary Clinton’s campaign in 2008. My memory is vague, but I think I saw it on FreeRepublic way before anything that could be construed as a hint from Clinton. Anyone have information on the very early days of birtherism?
Does “bob” who posts here run Gerbil Report?
Oh HELL no.
The most authoritative treatise on this topic is Loren Collins’ paper, “The Secret Origin of the Birthers.” I’ve added this to the site Resources menu.
http://barackryphal.blogspot.com/2011/06/secret-origin-of-birthers.html
I also have a series of articles on Birther Archaeology here:
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2009/02/where-did-born-in-africa-start-part-1/
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2009/02/where-did-born-in-africa-start-part-2/
Thank you. Your links show the Free Republic claim that birtherism originated with Hillary Clinton’s campaign is an obvious lie. (What a surprise…)
They’ve been doing that for a long time. It morphed from “Clinton supporters” to “the Clinton campaign” to “Hillary herself” over time, and sometimes back again.
All to console themselves they’re not vile racists.
BR Bob, not our bob, can be just as vile as his resident rodents. I don’t recall many of the Gerbils wandering over here. Most of them can’t handle life outside their echo chamber.
Rambo lives to troll and bait people so he posts in many places, until he gets banned.
Actually, birtherism started at the Free Republic 😯
Unless the Anti-Birther/Birther ratio is not in his favor, then he steers clear. About the only places Rambo feels safe posting is on BR and the blog of a certain Mr. “I’m being extradited to Kenya, Bruce! Send money!”
It’s always nice to start the day with a good laugh. This morning’s knee-slapper was in my e-mail’s inbox, courtesy of Fellowship of the Minds blogger “Dr. Eowyn”.
“Am sorry to bother you, I’m in Limassol Cyprus at the moment and i
just misplaced my bag containing all my vital items, phone, passport
and money at the bus station. I am stranded at the moment and i need
your help.
Eowyn”
I recognized the name in the “From” box as being the real name of this individual. But what puzzles me is why it was signed “Eowyn”. Whoever hijacked her e-mail is obviously familiar with her FOTM persona – perhaps the work of an Obot prankster?
For what it’s worth, if she were ever truly in trouble, I would help her. Well, maybe not with money, but, like, if she needed a ride to the next Tea Party rally, or if she was stranded in a ditch by the side of the road, or…
Alas Mr Crab this is a fairly regular scam that comes in and out of fashion fairly regularly, a slightly more sophisticated version Ye Olde Classic Nigerian 419 scam
I checked at FOTM, and Dr. E’s theory is that it’s retaliation from folks affiliated with the Religious Freedom Foundation, because of an article she posted accusing the RFF of instigating attacks against Christian chaplains and soldiers.
Naturally, other inmates at FOTM think the Obama administration is behind it. But then again, they also think Obama was the mastermind of New Coke, televised celebrity dancing competitions, and parachute jackets.
I don’t think I’m going to bother registering over there to make a comment, but this guy’s got some messed-up “facts”:
http://www.cerescourier.com/section/22/article/6081/
An example:
“Fact: No one has ever seen or verified Obama’s birth certificate. When the White House produced a certificate of live birth on the White House website on April 27, 2011, the posted certificate had a totally different print stock than other birth certificates released during 1961 and there was no embossed seal on it, since only an “uncertified copy” was released. On May 1, 2011, computer science and document management expert witness, Ivan Zatkovich, studied the document released by the White House. Mr. Zatkovich stated that documents normally contain one layer of PDF, but Obama’s copy had multiple layers of PDF, indicating it had been scanned multiple times, concluding it had been modified or edited in some fashion. His report concludes, “There is no specific evidence of how or why that content would have been changed, but the evidence clearly indicates that the document was changed.””
Mmmm, no.
I actually agree with with his basic principle. Which, ironically, means I’d probably never vote for him, and certainly wouldn’t vote for Huckabee and others who’ve been more explicit about their theocratic beliefs, for any executive office.
The fact that Carson so casually stereotypes Muslims pretty much finishes the job of ruling him out, so it’s not necessary to look further into how theocratic he really is.
Islam is theocratic as a matter of explicit doctrine, not as a result of the interpretation of a limited subset of its adherents like Christianity. So it’s not unreasonable for voters to look a little more carefully at a Muslim candidate’s religious beliefs to ensure that he/she is not “unsuitable for office in a government that strictly separates church and state”, because the odds of being theocratic are higher.
But that sort of evaluation of an individual by the voters is not at all like legislating a requirement that office holders believe in some particular deity, and is essentially the same as scoring based on whether the candidate supports metrification, socialized medicine, or looser pollution controls.
Tee hee! Falcon is absolutely livid that The Pope met with The President. Now he HATES the Pope. I kid you not.
Is Hillary Clinton the ‘original birther?’
Donald Trump and Ted Cruz are falsely claiming that Clinton started the rumors that the president was not born in the United States.
http://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/is-hillary-clinton-the-original-birther–531194947799
This is one of the best pieces I have seen on this topic.
Doc: This is one of the best pieces I have seen on this topic.
This one is good too.
Trump: Hillary Clinton’s the original birther
In the Rewrite, Donald Trump keeps talking where President Obama was born while claiming he’s finished talking about the President’s birthplace. MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell explains why the press should keep pressing the GOP frontrunner about it.
http://www.msnbc.com/the-last-word
I scanned Loren’s piece, and I see it as the source of the Kenyan birth coming from The Volokh Conspiracy, where a commenter created a hypothetical, and said hypothetical was copied in a comment on Free Republic as fact.
charo:
Eugene Volokh, December 1, 2008 at 12:07pm] Trackbacks
http://volokh.com/posts/1227910730.shtml
October 30, 2008 Rumor calls Obama’s birth certificate fake
“Even if a person is born outside the United States, courts have ruled any child born to at least one U.S. citizen is a U.S. citizen, Volokh said. Stanley Ann Dunham would have counted even if Obama’s Kenyan father did not.”
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2008-10-30/news/0810290685_1_obama-campaign-born-hawaii-department
10/25/2007 The New Right-Wing Smear Machine (at the end of the article)
http://www.thenation.com/article/new-right-wing-smear-machine/
I don’t think Volokh’s usually so careless. He did come back and post a correction to that:
http://www.volokh.com/posts/1227910730.shtml
I seem to recall Doc referring to Volokh’s correction somewhere. Doc never misses a trick.
You are misinterpreting. It was an unintentional hypothetical. You have to read Loren’s article.
Cody Robert Judy’s Motion for Reconsideration is supposed to be conferenced on Monday, even though SCOTUS doesn’t officially reconvene until a week from Monday. That makes it sound like it’s going to be a rather perfunctory proceeding. I expect that SCOTUS will deny his motion and then his petition will be dead because he failed to comply with the order to pay his docketing fee by July 13.
Politifact: The Obama Muslim Myth: The Clinton connection
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2015/sep/25/obama-muslim-myth-clinton-connection/
Kelly File Fact Check of Claims Clinton “Started Birtherism” Ignores Fox’s Role in Pushing Those Claims – Media Matters.
http://mediamatters.org/video/2015/09/24/kelly-file-fact-check-of-claims-clinton-started/205781
At a friends birthday party today, one of the guys I met had been in the US (Denver I think he said) for work a couple of years ago and met a guy he thought was a reasonable guy, and they exchanged email addresses to keep in touch. The guy is now bombarding him with Obama hate mail chain letters and he can’t get him to stop.
I advised him to block the sender, but I think he uses gmail or something and can’t do that.
Here was a quote from another FOX show.
“They were debating whether a Muslim should be a president back in the creation of our country,” Kilmeade opined. “There’s a whole book written on it. Back when you had Jefferson and Madison debating other great American founders about should a Jewish person be president? Should a Muslim person be president?”
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/09/elisabeth-hasselbeck-opposing-a-muslim-president-makes-ben-carson-a-real-person/
He may be talking about the 1779 Virginia Religious Freedom Act which obviously doesn’t say anything about being president. Maybe he was just making it up.
I’d send the guy’s email address to every left-leaning site, blog, etc and see how he feels being bombarded by pro-Obama email. 😀
If it is Gmail, open up the browser, far right hand side, click on the button looking like a cog wheel, select settings.
Go to ‘Filters and blocked addresses’, add the idiots email to the blocked list
Done…..
Back when I used to get chain hate-mail from my RWNJ friends and family, I’d REPLY ALL with the (easily-found) debunking documentation.
I no longer get such emails.
I think somebody must have swiped somebody’s voice recorder here. How else would they get the exact transcript.
Durham County Black Republican Committee
One of the many things that make me laugh at LoonyReport is the idea that they keep floating around that as soon as Obama is ‘proven’ to be a ‘usurper’, that IMMEDIATELY everything that has happened during his presidency will become null and void…as if it never existed. ‘Selfsovereign’ has been on a rant about this because somebody claimed that Obama might fake a serious illness, so that he could let Biden take over as President, just so that Biden could then give Obama a Presidential pardon for everything that had happened. ‘Selfsovereign’ said that it wouldn’t work because if Obama was proven to be a usurper, then his choice of Biden as running mate would also be invalid, and therefor he would be ineligible to succeed Obama, blah,blah,blah. Listening to the scenarios that these guys come up with makes me think that some of them missed their calling as fiction writers because their imaginations are amazing! But, to get back to my point, I have now found a fun new hobby. Whenever I see a post about how they are going to have to undo EVERYTHING that has happened during Obama’s Presidency, I remind them that Chester A Arthur has recently been ‘proven’ to also be a ‘usurper’ (equally crazy), so therefore, before they go about the business of overturning everything that Obama has done, they need to first go back in history and completely undo everything that Arthur did, also. Every law, treaty, etc. would be just as invalid as everything they claim about Obama. So, since the Arthur ‘crime’ was committed first, then they should remedy that one first before they take on Obama. But so far, nobody seems to have any desire to overturn anything that Chester A Arthur did. Why would they want justice for a ‘crime’ committed by one person, but not want justice for the same ‘crime’ committed by another person. Is there any obvious difference between these two Presidents that anybody can find that would explain the double standard? Maybe eye color, or shoe size, or ….? 👍🏻👎🏿
Birthers really do pin an awful lot on the word “if”, don’t they?
Uh, Obama didn’t chose Biden. The Electoral College did. and before that, the Democratic National Convention (voice vote on September 6).
The news says that the birther candidate will unveil his tax plan today. Apparently, he has one. I can only hope it will be as entertaining as his immigration plan.
There have been a lot of comments over the years, sometimes mocking, sometimes lamenting, about the amount of “apocalyptic” rhetoric among birthers in general, and especially at BR. Some of the loonier gerbils have spoken openly about revolution, civil war, and/or a military coup.
I just happened across a link to a disturbing article at Salon that claims that kind of thinking runs much wider and deeper than I (and probably others) thought.
It offers some interesting theories about how some of the wingnuts got to be that way, and why the GOP primary is going the way it is, that may inform discussions about birthers. Especially about the past, and possibly future, persistence of birfoonery in the face of reality.
Cody Roberts Judy’s dead case goes to the Supreme Court Long Conference today.
FWIW, here is a small article on the Long Conference.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/01/us/politics/supreme-courts-long-conference-where-appeals-go-to-die.html?_r=0
You are preaching to the choir. That is just one of MANY examples of delusional thinking when it comes to this “we can erase everything that Obama ever did in one day” kind of craziness. I guess the point that I was trying to make is that their basic argument is that Obama has ‘usurped’ the Presidency which means that they have not only the right, but the duty as ‘patriots’ to erase everything that the ‘illegal’ Obama did as President (I.e. Laws, treaties, Supreme Court appointments and therefore Supreme Court decisions, etc.)
However, by their own logic (flawed as it is), Chester A Arthur is just as guilty of ‘usurping’ as Obama is, but all of these ‘Patriots’ have no interest in trying to undo the illegal actions of that ‘criminal’ (Arthur). If it was the ‘usurpation’ that they had the problem with, they would be complaining just as much about overturning everything that Chester A Arthur had done (can you imagine). But since they aren’t, I have to think it’s not the supposed ‘usurpation’ that bothers these people, but something else about President Obama that bugs them. It’s a mixture of partisan politics, ignorance, and bigotry (not necessarily in that order) that motivates them, and I just like to point this out to them because it makes it harder for them to hide their true motivations.
I know.
Ah, there goes the Civil Service and back to the spoils system. Also we’d have to gut the Navy.
Won’t happen. They can’t even bother to attend birther rallies around the corner, they would never dare risk their own lives, they always hope others will die for them.
I have noticed that, even in their keyboard fantasies, wingnuts see themselves as spectators, or at most anonymous members of the mob. It does seem odd that their greatest ambition, even in the unfettered world of imagination, is to just show up.
They’re basically like children.
“Mommy will punish you and then she will give *me* all the cookies!”
Just the same they expect “the mob” to do their dirty job, then they want to be crowned God Emperor because they’ve been birthin’ from day one.
Then again, how many “leaders” have ever risked their lives on the battlefield? They imagine themselves like a general in their bunker, sending the soldiers to battle and reaping the rewards of victory.
I do a similar thing, particularly when I get errant nonsense that can get shot down by Snopes.com. Sometimes I get notes back reflecting embarrassment.
“Let’s you and him fight.” — J. Wellington Wimpy.
One of the oddest things I find about birther web sites and their forum chat (and that of right-wing nutjobs in generals) is their obsession with gay sex.
They always accuse their opponents of being gay (as if that’s a criminal offense), and sometimes their colleagues (when they’re having some internal drama), and usually seem to know a great deal about sexual practices they say they loathe and despise.
I’ve always wondered about how they become so knowledgeable about that, and more importantly, why?
I have picked up some words and phrases from BR that I never knew, and had to look up them up. The most notable was the whole “gerbil” thing (and from that the name of my parody web site, GerbilReport.com).
Some of the folks there refer to me as Dr. Cornhole, which is funny because around here, “cornhole” is a bean bag tossing game.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornhole
But I agree. The homoerotic fetishism at BR is bizarre. See also:
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2014/07/homoerotic-fetishism-at-birther-report/
Oh, dear. And here I thought the whole “gerbil” thing was simply something like a variant of referring to someone as being “Mickey Mouse.”
Hard-core birthers in general do not seem to be moral people. I don’t exactly share the general recent assessment in this thread.
In our society of today, they are fortunately almost powerless. They are, however, the same people who used to spectate and cheer and pack picnics while black people were flogged and hung from trees.
Obviously they’re not moral, and obviously, lacking solid arguments, they prefer to hit below the belt, and blame their enemies for “having had to do so.”
Furthermore, being right-wing nutjobs, being right-wing nutjobs, regard homosexuality as being utterly horrific, and believe that their enemies (not opponents) must all be gay, because they support gay rights. At the very least, right-wing nutjobs think that if they call their enemies gay, they can achieve two things:
1. Gratify their own egos
2. Anger and insult their enemies
But what baffles me about their homophobia and stream of anti-gay rhetoric is their seeming familiarity with gay sexual practices. How do they know so much about something they regard as abhorrent?
My guess is that a lot of these guys are extremely deeply closeted gays, who might have even had gay encounters of their own, and think that if they loudly gay-bash, they can deny it to themselves, and nobody will notice their secret life.
I would bet that they’re the kind of guys who had absolutely no luck whatsoever picking up ANY girl in that bar, and staggered off drunk with some guy at closing time, waking up in the morning in a strange apartment, buck naked, with a strange taste in his mouth, a snoring guy next to him, and suffering an incredible hangover.
From what I’ve personally witnessed [Jeb and George Bush, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Graham] all they do is step into the battlefields, pull down their pants, perform rapes, sodomies, child molestations, pull their pants back up, look to the Russian/Cuban infiltrators and say, “See, we’re just like you. Now, let’s get this cocaine train a rolling. Kill as many innocent Americans as you please because, quite frankly, we don’t give a d**n.”
An article in Pando (paywall, but the article’s unlocked for 24 hours) details the calculus behind Trump going birther in 2011, a scheme hatched by his now-former political consultant Roger Stone.
I haven’t seen Stone mentioned here before; his birtherism is, says the article, not at all ideological but purely pragmatic. He’s described as one of Nixon’s Dirty Tricksters from the early ’70s.
“The Donald Trump – Roger Stone show: Birth Harder”
Stone: “Personally I think it is brilliant. It’s base building. It gives voice to a concern shared by many on the right.”
The Philippines own birther crisis rages with news coverage daily. Is Grace Poe a natural born citizen? Three new articles:
http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2015/09/30/1505491/comelec-may-defer-set-ruling-poe
http://opinion.inquirer.net/88971/foundling-grace-now-a-heroine
http://www.manilatimes.net/lies-damned-lies-and-grace-poe-llamanzares/221344/
Over at the thing-that-won’t-die Mario said Vattel settled all that.
Of course. Everyone knows Vattel was by far the major influence on the definition of “natural born citizen” in Filipino Constitutional law.
I want to see Vattel’s impact on Mattel Toys.
I think he had a hand in Kenner going under. I just can’t shake this gut feeling, ya know?
Hey, Mattel owned the Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus for a while…most of the Birthers could fill in for their acts…elephants, trapeze artists, high-wire walkers, and most of all…clowns, clowns, clowns,clowns….
Well, enormous, of course. He lent his name to the entire enterprise.
They just turned the V upside down and doubled it to modernize the name a bit, and voila! Mattel.
And Barbie was created as a representation of Vattel’s ideal of woman. Blonde, large breasts, long legs… This is what woman was MEANT to be.
Unfortunately unpatriotic treasonous usurpers have now come along trying to poisonously corrupt Vattel’s ideal. Horrible stuff.
http://time.com/3593968/the-new-normal-barbie-comes-with-an-average-womans-proportions-and-cellulite-sticker-extension-packs/
SCOTUS published a list of cert. grants.
A shocker: Judy’s case’s not one of them.
Who could have seen that coming?
Interesting. My boyfriend is a great grandson of Charles Ringling. I don’t think he is aware of this. He hasn’t kept up with the family business since before it dissolved.
So, will CRJ show up and admit we tried to tell him this would happen and he was wrong? Probably not, huh?
Of course not; he’ll crow about his birther case pended for the longest at SCOTUS, as if that’s an accomplishment.
Judy on Teh Facebook:
In the sense of “not even the slightest bit perplexing.”
Oh my, what will he do when his cert isn’t granted on that day either? LMAO
He will painstakingly talk to each person on Earth, until he encounters at least one, who tells him that there is a way to characterize in written English, the improbability of finding dog poop on the planet Venus, such that that declaration alone becomes an additional ground for appealing to SCOTUS for reconsideration of his denied cert application, and then he will do so and triumphantly tell us about it.
Perplexing in the sense of, “I dropped this bowling ball on my foot, and now my foot seems to be swollen.”
I explained to CRJ that the best possible outcome for him from the 9/28 conference would be SCOTUS reversing its denial of his in forma pauperis application. Even if his cert petition had any merit it wasn’t going to be granted without SCOTUS soliciting a response from the respondents.
But CRJ lives in a fantasy world where he belives that he is going to force President Obama to flee the country in Air Force One, Reality has no discernible effect upon CRJ.
Technically, any plane the President is on is Air Force One, even if he flees in a small private Cessna. 😉 (Oh no, did I just wake the Fuddy crowd again?)
Obviously, Obama’s real BC is submerged in the newly found Waters of Mars! We need an immediate flight to Mars to prove they are not there. (Nobody trusts those Martians, mind you, they’re not from the *red* planet for no reason at all.)
Well, technicallly, a small private Cessna would be Executive One. If it were a Navy plane, it would be Navy One, and so on.
As a bit of trivia, there has never been a Coast Guard One, though there was a Coast Guard Two when Biden was on a helicopter to check flooding in Atlanta. The only Navy One was when GWB flew to the carrier for his “mission accomplished” speech.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transportation_of_the_President_of_the_United_States
Let him know…I was amused when Mattel had it for a while. They were obviously using it to promote their products.
But not if he’s no longer President.
IIRC, when Nixon left the White House for California on August 9, 1974, his plane’s call sign changed from Air Force One in midflight after Ford was sworn in.
CRJ’s latest is that he wants to be included in the Democratic debate on October 13.
Why he is “running” as a Democrat is perplexing. If he wants to challenge the eligibility of Rubio, Cruz, and Jindal he should run as a Republican, which would at least arguably give him standing. Of course, the fact that he has no chance of winning would be an insurmountable obstacle.
The Democrats haven’t had a comical candidate since George McGovern, and they need one for fairness.
(Which is admittedly unfair to McGovern. He was a legitimate war hero and an outstanding senator, who was in over his head as presidential candidate, but in 1972, he pulled some whoppers)