Kreep v. Peed: Votes trickle in

Posted on June 8, 2012 by Dr. Conspiracy

Remove all food items from the vicinity of your keyboard and monitor, then settle in for this video from Rachel Maddow.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

About Dr. Conspiracy

I'm not a real doctor, but I have a master's degree.
This entry was posted in Gary Kreep, Media, Videos and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

38 Responses to Kreep v. Peed: Votes trickle in

  1. Michael Heuss says:
    June 8, 2012 at 2:30 pm  (Quote)

    I assumed that the name was pronounced differently. Pay Ed, for instance. Or Ped. Whattya know.

  2. BatGuano says:
    June 8, 2012 at 2:33 pm  (Quote)

    Michael Heuss:
    I assumed that the name was pronounced differently.

    the E’s are silent.

  3. Dave B. says:
    June 8, 2012 at 3:04 pm  (Quote)

    Well, if this judge business peters out and goes down the tubes, Mr. Peed’s still got his modeling career to fall back on.
    http://www.brandtalent.net/Portfolio.aspx?mid=180

  4. Arthur says:
    June 8, 2012 at 4:45 pm  (Quote)

    Looks like Garland Peed over Mr. Kreep, and Gary says the results stink.

    Garland Peed–say it, don’t spray it.

    After this election, we won’t get Peed again.

    Garland Peed made Gary Kreep.

  5. justlw says:
    June 8, 2012 at 5:04 pm  (Quote)

    Sticking with our continuing “stay classy” mode, The Daily Beast‘s headline:

    “Garland Peed on Top of Kreep”

  6. US Citizen says:
    June 8, 2012 at 5:10 pm  (Quote)

    When you’re in a nation, men must stand.
    We all must get a fair shake, but never miss our target or cause the snow to yellow.
    Only then will we get relief.

  7. Thrifty says:
    June 8, 2012 at 6:28 pm  (Quote)

    That was hard to get through. That woman is so obnoxious. Her attempts at humor through changes in vocal inflection was particularly grating.

  8. El Diablo Negro says:
    June 8, 2012 at 7:13 pm  (Quote)

    Between Maddow & Limbaugh, both are hard for me listen too. I was never one for over the top party-liners, but that’s just me.

    When it comes to drinking the political kool-aid…I stay away like a diabetic.

    Thrifty:
    That was hard to get through.That woman is so obnoxious.Her attempts at humor through changes in vocal inflection was particularly grating.

  9. Expelliarmus says:
    June 8, 2012 at 8:03 pm  (Quote)

    Peed has pulled ahead, strongly:

    GARLAND PEED 165360 50.17%
    GARY GEORGE KREEP 164267 49.83%

    This is a lead (for Peed) of 1,093 votes.

    88,000 votes remain to be counted.

  10. Dr. Conspiracy says:
    June 8, 2012 at 8:05 pm  (Quote)

    I don’t make a habit of listening to either.

    El Diablo Negro: Between Maddow & Limbaugh, both are hard for me listen too. I was never one for over the top party-liners, but that’s just me.

  11. Keith says:
    June 8, 2012 at 9:45 pm  (Quote)

    El Diablo Negro: Between Maddow & Limbaugh, both are hard for me listen too. I was never one for over the top party-liners, but that’s just me.

    I rather enjoy Maddow. She does go over the top sometimes, and then it is entertaining.

    But at least she doesn’t lie or hate like the guy you folks mentioned.

  12. jayHG says:
    June 8, 2012 at 9:53 pm  (Quote)

    Dr., your quote of the day says Kreep is superior court judge elect. Was that before final vote. Out? You guys are saying Ped beat him.

  13. Thrifty says:
    June 8, 2012 at 10:12 pm  (Quote)

    I suppose you have a point, but it seems like such total pandering BS. The lesser of two evils is still evil. Not that I’m calling Rachel Maddow evil. Just using the metaphor.

    Keith: I rather enjoy Maddow. She does go over the top sometimes, and then it is entertaining.

    But at least she doesn’t lie or hate like the guy you folks mentioned.

  14. Joe Acerbic says:
    June 8, 2012 at 10:30 pm  (Quote)

    I see some equating of Maddow and Limbaugh, which prompts me to point out an extremely significant difference: Limbaugh lies all the time about everything, Maddow doesn’t.

    Maddow also doesn’t travel to the child prostitution hubs of the Caribbean packing Viagra, AFAIK.

  15. Sef says:
    June 8, 2012 at 10:54 pm  (Quote)

    Can we assume that we are not going to see a decrease in the 88000 remaining uncounted ballots until Monday? Or will they work this weekend? They don’t really need to decide anything quite yet.

  16. gorefan says:
    June 8, 2012 at 11:21 pm  (Quote)

    Sef:
    Can we assume that we are not going to see a decrease in the 88000 remaining uncounted ballots until Monday?

    I saw this note at San Diego County’s website:

    Next update: June 11th at 5pm

    http://www.sdcounty.ca.gov/voters/Eng/Eindex.shtml

  17. donna says:
    June 8, 2012 at 11:23 pm  (Quote)

    maddow has the BEST research dept on tv – and when she errs, SHE ADMITS IT

  18. Expelliarmus says:
    June 8, 2012 at 11:42 pm  (Quote)

    jayHG:
    Dr., your quote of the day says Kreep is superior court judge elect.Was that before final vote. Out? You guys are saying Ped beat him.

    The quote is dead wrong. The election results have not been certified. At the point of the process when election-day votes had been counted, Kreep had a small lead in the vote count, of roughly 50 votes. At that time there were at least 135,000 uncounted absentee or provisional votes. Currently, in California, more than half of the voters are registered as “permanent absentee” or “vote by mail”.

    I don’ t know whether Doc intends to be satirical or is being uncharacteristically careless, but the San Diego registrar of voters web site reporting primary results contains very bold letters at the top of the page:

    “THESE RESULTS ARE UNOFFICIAL
    Last updated on: [date] at: [time]
    There are approximately _____ Absentee / Provisional ballots still to be counted”

    Statistically, Peed & Kreep are tied and have been so throughout the reporting of votes. When every last vote is counted, if one candidate has only 1 vote more than the other, that person will be the Judge – though of course there would likely be a recount and potential challenges in that setting.

    But no one has yet been elected to fill that seat.

  19. Paper says:
    June 9, 2012 at 12:42 am  (Quote)

    99% of the time. There are a couple instances where she goes astray and does not even notice much less acknowledge. Rare, but it happens. My take is her investment gets the better of her a couple times where she goes just a little further than she actually needs to make a good story. Keep in mind I am a huge Rachel Maddow fan. For one, because she is honest and corrects herself when she is aware of her mistake.

    I also don’t think she is over the top as some have said where. She is liberal and makes no bones about it, but she debates honestly and respectfully, while not taking spin. Her show is an opinion show, not straight news, but within that constraint she strives to be honest.

    donna:
    maddow has the BEST research dept on tv – and when she errs, SHE ADMITS IT

  20. Dr. Conspiracy says:
    June 9, 2012 at 1:36 am  (Quote)

    While I try to figure out whether this is satirical or careless, I’ll make an adjustment.

    Expelliarmus: I don’ t know whether Doc intends to be satirical or is being uncharacteristically careless, but the San Diego registrar of voters web site reporting primary results contains very bold letters at the top of the page:

  21. nbc says:
    June 9, 2012 at 2:42 am  (Quote)

    Latest count:

    Last updated on: 06-08-12 at: 16:46:56
    There are approximately 88000 Absentee / Provisional ballots still to be counted

    GARLAND PEED 165360 50.17%
    GARY GEORGE KREEP 164267 49.83%

    At the end of the day of voting

    GARLAND PEED 147683 49.99%
    GARY GEORGE KREEP 147739 50.01%

  22. Sef says:
    June 9, 2012 at 12:54 pm  (Quote)

    Thrifty:
    changes in vocal inflection was particularly grating.

    You can have your audiologist adjust the frequency response of your aid so you won’t have this problem.

  23. Joey says:
    June 10, 2012 at 8:57 pm  (Quote)

    Barnett, Keyes, et. al. v Obama with Gary Kreep as attorney of record for the petitioners was distributed for conference at the Supreme Court of the United States on June 7th.
    http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/11-1225.htm

  24. Rickey says:
    June 10, 2012 at 10:04 pm  (Quote)

    Joey:
    Barnett, Keyes, et. al. v Obama with Gary Kreep as attorney of record for the petitioners was distributed for conference at the Supreme Court of the United States on June 7th.
    http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/11-1225.htm

    It was distributed for conference without any of the justices calling for a response from the respondents, which means that SCOTUS has already decided to deny cert.

  25. Joe Acerbic says:
    June 11, 2012 at 12:08 am  (Quote)

    It’s like the Supreme Court process was designed to give birfoons many, many happy weekends full of hope followed always by inevitable Monday hangovers.

  26. Jamese777 says:
    June 11, 2012 at 12:31 am  (Quote)

    Rickey: It was distributed for conference without any of the justices calling for a response from the respondents, which means that SCOTUS has already decided to deny cert.

    Darn it Rickey, you take all the suspense out of Cert denial. There are some of us who enjoy scrolling through the petitions and finding for ourselves that mystical word “DENIED!” 🙂

  27. Whatever4 says:
    June 11, 2012 at 1:35 am  (Quote)

    Jamese777: Darn it Rickey, you take all the suspense out of Cert denial.There are some of us who enjoy scrolling through the petitions and finding for ourselves that mystical word “DENIED!”

    There’s always the exceedingly faint hope that one of the justices will attach a pithy comment, like “Denied, Dismissed, and Don’t file this crap again. Obama is a natural born citizen.”

  28. gorefan says:
    June 11, 2012 at 10:13 am  (Quote)

    Jamese777: you take all the suspense out of Cert denial.

    Order list is out

    http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/061112zor.pdf

    CERTIORARI DENIED

    11-1225 KEYES, ALAN, ET AL. V. OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL.

  29. gorefan says:
    June 11, 2012 at 8:31 pm  (Quote)

    Lastest Vote Count

    26000 left to count

    Next update June 12, 2012 at 5:00 p.m.

    GARLAND PEED
    193486
    50.08%

    GARY GEORGE KREEP
    192885
    49.92%

    601 vote difference.

  31. gorefan says:
    June 12, 2012 at 8:23 pm  (Quote)

    Kreep is creeping up

    GARLAND PEED
    195920
    50.01%

    GARY GEORGE KREEP
    195841
    49.99%

    There are approximately 17700 Absentee / Provisional ballots still to be counted

    Next update: June 13th at 5pm

  32. justlw says:
    June 13, 2012 at 12:37 am  (Quote)

    gorefan: Kreep gives an interview.

    As interviewed by Hipster KPBS Host.

    He’s still hanging on to Mombasa, eh? Birfers gotta birf…

  33. Sef says:
    June 13, 2012 at 8:32 pm  (Quote)

    The see-saw continues with Kreep ahead by 216 votes. 13500 ballots still to be counted. http://www.sdcounty.ca.gov/voters/results/transform.htm?paramVal1=superior_court.xsl

  34. Sef says:
    June 14, 2012 at 9:21 am  (Quote)

    Sef:
    The see-saw continues with Kreep ahead by 216 votes. 13500 ballots still to be counted. http://www.sdcounty.ca.gov/voters/results/transform.htm?paramVal1=superior_court.xsl

    It looks like they counted 4200 ballots yesterday. At that rate this will take 5 more days.

  35. Dr. Conspiracy says:
    June 15, 2012 at 7:45 am  (Quote)

    Kreep lead widens:

    Kreep 199998
    Peed 199174

  36. bgansel9 says:
    June 15, 2012 at 10:34 am  (Quote)

    Orly goes after Gary Kreep:

    Too much to copy from her post, but this is how it ends:

    “California attorney Gary Kreep put his name and California bar license under this garbage and this attorney might become a judge in the near future. This is absolutely frightening. It is mind boggling that a person like this will be allowed to become a judge.
    If Kreep becomes a judge, lives of multiple individuals can be ruined. Many lives are affected even now, with him being an attorney. This matter requires urgent investigation, as Kreep might become a judge in near future. If he could show zero conscience, zero integrity and zero moral values in attacking multiple innocent individuals with a bogus law suit, colluding with a dangerous criminal and another attorney without ethics, he can inflict much more damage to the society as a judge. While I agreed with the subject matter of some other cases brought by Kreep, his latest actions are so outrageous that I cannot be silent and an urgent attention is needed.
    I trust the disciplinary counsel of the CA bar with review this matter with the outmost urgency.”
    Sincerely,
    Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
    cc
    1. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme court of Pennsylvania
    2. District Attorney San Diego county, CA
    3. District Attorney Philadelphia, PA
    4. Disciplinary committee of the US District Court, Central District CA
    6. Disciplinary committee 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
    7. Disciplinary board 3rd District Court of Appeals

    Hahaha! Love it when they try to decapitate each other. Need more popcorn!

  37. Keith says:
    June 15, 2012 at 10:52 am  (Quote)

    Dr. Conspiracy:
    Kreep lead widens:

    Kreep 199998
    Peed 199174

    Looks like the odometer on my car (in kilometers). And it still drives like it came off the lot yesterday.

  38. John says:
    June 15, 2012 at 11:47 am  (Quote)

    By the almost perfect 50/50 split, it is clear that most people who voted between Peed and Kreep put as much thought into their decision as in flipping a coin.

    I pay pretty close attention to politics and I don’t recall seeing any information about either candidate before the election. Plenty afterwards though. Then again, with the endless onslaught of political ads, phone calls and fliers, I tuned most of it out so maybe the info was there and I missed it.

    Isn’t there an old lawyer’s trick of hiding significant information in a mountain of useless claptrap? This may be a case in point. Now with billions to be spent in the next few months on the presidential election what we have considered mountains will soon look like molehills.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.