WorldNetDaily reports that the Huffington Post, the number 31 most popular web site in the United States according to site tracking service alexa.com, has been purchased by AOL for $300,000,000. This is what WND boss Joseph Farah had to say:
Because Americans have been bombarded for so long with “news” that is little more than opinion, they are now finding it increasingly difficult to distinguish between the two. There is no better illustration of this than the Huffington Puffington Post, which must be trafficked by every irrational, emotion-driven left-winger in the U.S. to achieve its Internet rankings.
Of course, in fairness to Joseph Farah, WorldNetDaily is more into lies and distortion than it is into plain “opinions” and it could only hope for a ranking like that of the Huffington Post. (WND is number 521 as of today). Personally, I don’t frequent either site. I guess that makes me not an “irrational, emotion-driven left-winger”.
Looks like that meter reached critical mass, Doc. Guess you’ll have to build a newer and stronger one.
If you’re describing Joseph Farah’s irony, using a graphic of a nuclear explosion seems completely rational.
However if you’re actually exploding H-bombs “unemotionally”, that’s purely the mindset of the right-wing.
(Cue “Bomb Bomb Bomb Iran” music..)
Fwiw, you can see quite a lot of cool craters and other results of nuclear explosions by visiting the Pacific testing range (Marshall Islands) or Nevada testing range using GoogleEarth.
The range in Nevada is filled with moon-like craters.
The 1st test (Trinity in New Mexico) looks very unimpressive when compared to these higher power tests in NV.
Look up Operation Plowshare for the Sedan test.
That one made an amazing crater.
Joseph Farah doesn’t even correct errors on his site.
That would probably involve having to retract the entire site.
Personally, I don’t frequent either site. I guess that makes me not an “irrational, emotion-driven left-winger”.
Hold on now Dr c, If there’s one thing I ve learned by reading your site is the dictum of logic that absence of evidence does not prove a….a … Something about ones original constitution. I’ll check my notes 😉
In their world, admitting you’re wrong is worse than being wrong.
Either that or they think you’re never wrong unless you admit you’re wrong.
That school of thought seems to work quite well for Andrew Breitbart and Glenn Beck.
The pornstache is never wrong!
Daily Kos has a top story on the birther “debate” —
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/02/14/944267/-Birther-debate-alive-according-to-Politico-
The writer’s conclusion:
“It’s random Republicans who act as if that certificate of live birth doesn’t exist so they can continue to peddle their racism under the guise of concern for the Constitution.”
Couldn’t put it better myself.
Excellent article and right on point…Especially how all of the so called birther bills are being sponsored by Republicans….Which shows how they “pander” to the birthers in a shameless attempt to get their votes while “officially denouncing” them in public….The hypocrisy is amazing…
There is no equivalence between WND and Huffington Post. WND employs right-wing hacks and serial liars such as Jerome Corsi. If you go to Huffington Post’s home page today, you’ll see pieces written by the following people of substance:
Robert Kuttner: Co-founder and co-editor of The American Prospect
Robert Reich, Former Secretary of Labor
Michael Brenner, Professor of International Affairs, University of Pittsburgh
Henry Siegman, President, U.S./Middle East Project
Andy Stern, Georgetown Public Policy Institute and Former President, SEIU
Rep. Mike Honda, 15th Congressional District of California in the U.S. House
Serene Jones, President, Union Theological Seminary
David Coates, Worrell Professor of Anglo-American Studies, Wake Forest University, Department of Politics
In addition, Huffington Post frequently carries pieces which are critical of Obama and the Democrats. The difference is that the HuffPo pieces criticize Obama about his policies, rather than make up phony stories about his birth certificate. Also, HuffPo doesn’t have a PayPal button and any registered user can post comments on any topic.
Well, there is something of an equivalence in one area: science and medicine. HuffPo’s medical coverage is replete with quackery and pseudoscience, just like WND’s, and falls far below the standards of good journalism. The two even promote some of the same kinds of pseudoscience on occasion, like anti-vaccine nonsense.
Let me first thank you Dr. Conspiracy for your efforts. The information found on this site is quite handy for those, like me, who enjoy debunking from the periphery….but can’t quite devote themselves to full-time rabbit-hole spelunking.
Forgive my being off topic, but could someone please tell me an appropriate location to ask a question about a previously covered topic in such a way that it might have a chance of being seen.
Thanks, Wile E.
.
The Occasional Open Thread – Mark II Turbocharged Special Edition
I visit the HuffPo every day. Of course, I’m what the Wall Street Journal derisively refers to as a lefty.
I’ve calmed waaay down. In college, I was a Trotskyite.
That’s interesting. I don’t believe that I’ve ever read any of science and medicine articles on HuffPo, so they have never made an impression on me. Bu health and science quackery is another plague which has grown exponentially thanks to the Internet.
One thing I never miss on HuffPo is Sunday’s commentary on the day’s talk shows by Jason Linkins. It’s hilarious and saves you the time and trouble of actually watching those dreadful shows yourself.
Check out Orac’s blog, Respectful Insolence. At http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/ . He regularly covers the quackery and woo that HuffPo publishes.
It’ll get seen no matter where you type it, as the question above was seen. The most virtuous place would be in the current open thread topic, which right now is:
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2011/02/the-occasional-open-thread-mark-ii-turbocharged-special-edition/#comments
The caption under the picture: “Irony meter exploding” should leave no doubt in anyone’s mind as to the intent of the image.
Sure, but what graphic will you use if Obama is re-elected? 😉
This one: http://moviechopshop.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/eraserhead.jpg
Thank you Rickey for proving dr c’s point originale. Sheesh.
Thanks.