The United States Constitution in Article I Section 8 states that the Congress has the power:
To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;
Some have gone so far as to say that the phrase “the Law of Nations” is a reference to Emerich Vattel’s work commonly known by that name. I think most would find that silly, but let’s look closer.
- It must be a citation because it is capitalized. FALSE. Every noun in the Constitution is capitalized, so capitalization here implies no special meaning. Add to that the fact that “the” is not capitalized; a citation should read “The Law of Nations” not “the Law of Nations.”
- But it is still the title of de Vattel’s book. FALSE. The title of de Vattel’s book was Le Droit des gens ou principes de la loi naturelle appliqués à la conduite et aux affaires des Nations et des Souverains. “The Law of Nations” isn’t even the full English title.
- But it is still the title of de Vattel’s book. FALSE. Look at the Constitution again, at the larger phrase: “Offences against the Law of Nations.” Guess what? That is the title of Chapter 5 of Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England, the most influential legal treatise of the time. I would say that if anything, Blackstone has the stronger claim than Vattel.
“… Offences against the Law of Nations;”
So the birthers believe that the Constitution is concerned with people committing offences against a book.
I suppose you get a month in jail if you get the book wet, six weeks if you break the binding, and six months if you burn it.
Maybe just a fine if you bend a page to book mark it.
Yeah, birthers are stupid.